Friday, May 8, 2009

But will she have to give the fake breasts back? It's hard to be a "Christian Role Model": Miss California's semi-nude photos, and more...


Okay, let's quick catch up:

Miss California, Carrie Prejean, lost the Miss U.S.A. pageant recently - in large part due to her anti-same-gender marriage answer to judge Perez Hilton.

Following her loss, she became a "darling" of the conservative/religious right, and signed on to be a spokesperson for the National Organization for Marriage’s campaign against same-sex marriage.

This week, semi-nude pictures were published on the web of Ms. Prejean, questioning her "Christian role model" credentials.

These photos seem to be in violation of Ms. Prejean's contract with the Miss California organization, who are already quite angry with her due to her expression of her political views.

"In the entire history of the Miss USA, no reigning title holder has so readily committed her face and voice to a more divisive or polarizing issue," organizers said in a statement.

"We are deeply saddened Carrie Prejean has forgotten her platform of the Special Olympics, her commitment to all Californians, and solidified her legacy as one that goes beyond the right to voice her beliefs and instead reveals her opportunistic agenda."


Ms. Prejean says the topless photos were taken when she was 17, and that they were simply part of her work as a model.

Her detractors say the shots were clearly taken recently, after her breast enhancement surgery.

The breast enhancement surgery that she had 6 weeks prior to the Miss USA contest. The fake breasts the Miss California Organization PAID FOR.

What???

Okay, really, I like a contest as much as anyone else, and I confess I watch "Make Me A Supermodel," (which has men and women competing) yet I have to say that these pageants (whether or not they call them "scholarship programs") keep women down in our culture - they make women seem trivial, holding up a few as "models" while saying to everyone else that if you don't measure up physically, you're not as worthy of admiration.

An image from the Miss USA website.

Beauty contests are harsh things.

But a pageant that PAYS for a woman to get fake boobs so she can better compete in the next pageant?

ICK - ICK - ICK!!!

I hate everything about that - what it says about our culture (we don't care if the exterior beauty is real or not) - what is says about winning (we don't care about playing "fair" as long as we win) - what it says about hypocrisy - For a competition to be okay with paying for a contestant to get breast implants but not be okay for contestants to have topless photos taken seems to be wanting it both ways - they want the girls to LOOK like a whore, but act like a nun?
Am I the only one that thinks this is absurd?

As much as I dislike Ms. Prejean's wanting to be Miss California and Miss USA - in some way representing me - while she doesn't want me and other GLBTQ people to have equal civil rights, I'm also appalled by a woman who would let an organization pay for her to get breast implants so she could look more the part of the buxom cliche of "Miss U.S.A."

I wonder, now that the Miss California organization is so angry with her, do her newly fake breasts make Ms. Prejean as uncomfortable as they make me - just knowing about them?

And, if she loses her conflict with the Miss California organization, will Carrie Prejean have to give the fake breasts back?

And where, in all this controversy, is Kristen Dalton, the Miss USA winner?

What do you think?

***
Breaking news, per Today's (May 8, 2009) Philadelphia Daily News Tattle Column:
According to TMZ.com, the roots of Carrie's bias against gay marriage stems from her parents, who filed for divorce in 1988 (which must have been about the time she was born). But TMZ says the divorce and custody fights went on for more than a decade and a great deal of the acrimony stemmed from homosexual allegations.
According to a filing from Carrie's dad, in 1996, his ex accused him, in front of Carrie, of homosexuality.
The papers also quote a court-appointed doctor who said, "The mother questioned [within Carrie's earshot] whether [her father] was a homosexual or had a homosexual roommate."
In court papers from 2000, the court-appointed counselor says Carrie's mom "also alleges the father told the girls their stepfather was gay, that all men with mustaches are gay."
And then there's the letter from Carrie's sister explaining the time the girls were visiting dad and saw dad's roommate in bed with another man.
"I don't think it's right for my sister & I to have to live that way," Carrie's sister wrote.


Interesting...

4 comments:

a. fortis said...

"they want the girls to LOOK like a whore, but act like a nun"--I think you hit that right on the head. Whether or not it's the intent, that's what so much of mass media--and much of what is aimed AT women--is saying.

What annoys me the most is how much mainstream news attention this story is getting when it sort of seems like non-news in some ways...a beauty pageant participant got breast implants? Noo waaaay, really? :D

Sarah Laurenson said...

Um, yeah, beauty pageants. Or are they supposed to be called talent pageants now? And the little girls who are dolled up to look like whores when they're, what, five years old? The whole industry is disgusting, if you ask me. But it's somebody's cup of tea or it wouldn't exist.

My issue with Miss CA's answer was not really that she is against gay marriage, but rather that she was nearly incoherent and actually said she was both for and against it. If she's anti-gay marriage, that's her opinion and she's welcome to be honest and share it. I love that about our country. But to have a representative who can't frame her own thoughts in a coherent fashion when she knows the types, and perhaps even the exact, questions she might be asked? Totally unprepared and/or stupid.

Her background does explain a lot though.

Eve Porinchak said...

To me, the whole snafu is just pure comedy. The fact that she not only stated that "marriage should be between a man and a woman", but said it in response to a question posed by Perez Hilton...genius! I couldn't write this stuff if I tried.

I mean, Perez Hilton, for crying out loud! Does she live under a rock? Does she not know who he is and what he does to people he dislikes? He's the skewer-king, and the fact that she became his latest rotisserie chicken in a matter of seconds, on a national stage, during a beauty pageant...hysterical. (Although, after laughing, I did feel a bit sorry for her...I mean, this IS America and we DO promote freedom of speech, and she IS entitled to an opinion different from my own, and her feelings do NOT make her a bad person.)

Now, the whole "you must look like a stripper to win these pageants, but you must act like a good, wholesome Christian" thing is just plain creepy. But am I shocked that the Miss California people PAID for her breast implants?? Sadly, not really.

Sarah's right. This whole pageant thing "is somebody's cup of tea, or it wouldn't exist."

Great post, Lee!

Eve

Lee Wind said...

latest update May 15, 2009

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h2k_jaowU7BPFzCx99CyZNL4HIVAD985I3A00

Miss CA Director (and former Miss USA) Shanna Moakler resigns after Trump decides to keep Miss Prejean as Miss California!